Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(16)2022 08 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2023677

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to assess the acceptability and feasibility of offering risk-based breast cancer screening and its integration into regular clinical practice. A single-arm proof-of-concept trial was conducted with a sample of 387 women aged 40-50 years residing in the city of Lleida (Spain). The study intervention consisted of breast cancer risk estimation, risk communication and screening recommendations, and a follow-up. A polygenic risk score with 83 single nucleotide polymorphisms was used to update the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium risk model and estimate the 5-year absolute risk of breast cancer. The women expressed a positive attitude towards varying the frequency of breast screening according to individual risk and, especially, more frequently inviting women at higher-than-average risk. A lower intensity screening for women at lower risk was not as welcome, although half of the participants would accept it. Knowledge of the benefits and harms of breast screening was low, especially with regard to false positives and overdiagnosis. The women expressed a high understanding of individual risk and screening recommendations. The participants' intention to participate in risk-based screening and satisfaction at 1-year were very high.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Early Detection of Cancer , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Mammography , Mass Screening , Proof of Concept Study
2.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 58(6): 969-977, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1916209

ABSTRACT

AIM: Procedures normally performed in the hospital setting are increasingly delivered as part of hospital at home (HAH) programmes. The aim of this study is to describe the procedures and diseases treated during the first 2 years of a new paediatric HAH programme. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational study conducted in the HAH programme of Niño Jesús Children's Hospital (Spain). We included demographic data, diagnosis and procedures delivered to patients admitted to the HAH programme from November 2018 to November 2020. RESULTS: There were 935 admissions of 833 patients. The median age was 5 years (interquartile range 2.3-9.5). Seventy-five percent of patients were previously healthy. The most frequent illnesses were acute infections (37%) (e.g. complicated appendicitis and ENT, genitourinary, skin and soft tissue infections) and acute respiratory diseases (17.3%) (e.g. asthma, bronchiolitis and pneumonia). Thirty-six percent of admissions underwent nocturnal polysomnography. The median length of stay was 4 days (SD 4.9 days). Eight percent of the episodes studied required care in the emergency department due to condition worsening (55.3%) and problems with devices (36.1%). Hospital readmission was required in 5.6% of cases, 42.4% of which later resumed care in the HAH. The estimated daily cost of HAH is 330.65 euros, while the hospital per-day costs of polysomnography, asthma and endovenous therapy are 1899.24, 1402.5, and 976.26 euros. Ninety percent of families reported a high level of satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Paediatric HAH programmes are a feasible, cost-effective alternative to hospital care. Further studies should compare the evolution of patients treated in the traditional hospital setting and those in HAH.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Home Care Services , Acute Disease , Child , Child, Preschool , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitals , Humans
3.
Reumatologia clinica ; 18(3):150-156, 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1733366

ABSTRACT

Objective To describe the experience of treatment with baricitinib (BARI) and/or tocilizumab (TCZ), in monotherapy or combined, in patients admitted for interstitial pneumonia secondary to COVID19, and for 30 days after discharge. Methods Medical records of patients admitted with COVID19 and IP with PaO2/FiO2 < 300, treated with BARI and/or TCZ, and compared with patients who did not, were retrospectively reviewed. Results Sixty patients were included;43 (72%) are males, mean age 67 (SD: 14) years (<50 years: 17%;51–70: 30%;>70: 53%), with 8.5 (SD: 1) days of symptoms. Sixteen (27%) patients required ICU (94% in <70 years). Fifteen (25%) patients died, 67% in >70 years;11 (18%) patients died in the first 15 days of admission and 4 (7%) between days 16 to 30. Twenty-three (38%) patients received BARI, 12 (52%) monotherapy (Group 1), during 6 (SD: 2.6) days on average, none required ICU and 2 (17%) died. Thirty-one (52%) patients received TCZ, 20 (33%) as monotherapy (Group 2), 16 (52%) patients required ICU and 4 (20%) died. In the 11 (18%) patients who received BARI (2.8 [SD: 2.5] days average) and TCZ combined (Group 3), 3 (27%) required ICU and died. There were no severe side effects in BARI or TCZ patients. In the 17 (28%) patients who received neither BARI nor TCZ (Group 4), none required ICU and 6 (35%) died. Mean (SD) PaO2/FiO2 at admission between groups was respectively: 167 (82.3), 221 (114.9), 236 (82.3), 276 (83.2). Conclusion Treatment with BARI and TCZ did not cause serious side effects. They could be considered early in patients with NI secondary to COVID19 and impaired PaO2/PaFi.

4.
Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia ; 2021.
Article in Spanish | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1451763

ABSTRACT

Propósito: el virus SARS-CoV-2, causante de la enfermedad COVID-19, se transmite por aerosoles o por contacto con superficies infectadas. La ruta de entrada al cuerpo se produce a través de la mucosa nasal, oral o conjuntival. El personal sanitario debe usar medidas de protección efectivas a la entrada del virus en mucosas, tanto filtros físicos como antisépticos. Uno de los antisépticos usados en Oftalmología, formulado a base de ácido hipocloroso 0,01%, consideramos que podría tener acción virucida frente al virus SARS-CoV-2. El objetivo del estudio fue revisar la evidencia científica sobre la actividad virucida del ácido hipocloroso frente al SARS- CoV- 2 Métodos: se realizó una búsqueda exhaustiva en las bases de datos de Pubmed y Web of Sciencie para identificar artículos relevantes sobre la actividad virucida del ácido hipocloroso en diferentes concentraciones, publicados hasta el 4 de Octubre de 2020. Resultados: La búsqueda arrojó un total de 20 artículos. Los estudios analizados mostraron pruebas de la eficacia virucida del ácido hipocloroso, a una concentración del 0,01%, frente a SARS-CoV-2, así como frente a otros virus. Conclusiones: el ácido hipocloroso 0,01% podría actuar como antiséptico eficaz frente a SARS-CoV-2, creando una barrera protectora sobre las mucosas para evitar la entrada del virus y el desarrollo de la infección COVID-19. El producto puede ser aplicado en ojos, nariz y boca sin efectos nocivos. Por ello, consideramos necesario valorar su uso en el protocolo de atención sanitaria al paciente en consultas de Oftalmología, así como recomendar su uso a la población general para disminuir la carga viral y/o evitar transmisión de la infección. No obstante, se requerirían estudios adicionales in vivo para confirmar su acción virucida.

5.
Blood Transfus ; 19(2): 158-167, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1067610

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic is placing blood and tissue establishments under unprecedented stress, putting its capacity to provide the adequate care needed at risk. Here we reflect on how our integrated organisational model has faced the first impact of the pandemic and describe what challenges, opportunities and lessons have emerged. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The organisational model of the Catalan Blood and Tissue Bank (Banc de Sang i Teixits, BST) is described. The new scenario was managed by following international recommendations and considering the pandemic in a context of volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA), allowing rapid measures to be taken. These aimed to: ensure donor safety, promote proper responses to patients' needs, ensure the health and well-being of personnel, and prepare for future scenarios. RESULTS: The BST has adapted its activities to the changes in demand. No shortage of any product or service occurred. Donor acceptance, safety and wellbeing were maintained except for tissue donation, which almost completely stopped. To support the health system, several activities have been promoted: large-scale convalescent plasma (CP) production, clinical trials with CP and mesenchymal stromal cells, massive COVID-19 diagnoses, and participation in co-operative research and publications. Haemovigilance is running smoothly and no adverse effects have been detected among donors or patients. DISCUSSION: Several elements have proven to be critical when addressing the pandemic scenario: a) the early creation of a crisis committee in combination with technical recommendations and the recognition of a VUCA scenario; b) identification of the strategies described; c) the integrated donor-to-patient organisational model; d) active Research and Development (R&D); and e) the flexibility of the staff. It is essential to underline the importance of the need for centralised management, effective contingency strategies, and early collaboration with peers.


Subject(s)
Blood Banks/organization & administration , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Tissue Banks/organization & administration , Blood Banks/supply & distribution , Blood Component Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Blood Donors , Bone Marrow Transplantation , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/therapy , Humans , Immunization, Passive , Models, Organizational , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Safety , Spain , Tissue and Organ Procurement , COVID-19 Serotherapy
6.
Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed) ; 2020 Nov 28.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-997479

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the experience of treatment with baricitinib (BARI) and/or tocilizumab (TCZ), in monotherapy or combined, in patients admitted for interstitial pneumonia secondary to COVID19, and for 30 days after discharge. METHODS: Medical records of patients admitted with COVID19 and IP with PaO2/FiO2<300, treated with BARI and/or TCZ, and compared with patients who did not, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included; 43 (72%) are males, mean age 67 (SD: 14) years (<50 years: 17%; 51-70: 30%; >70: 53%), with 8.5 (SD: 1) days of symptoms. Sixteen (27%) patients required ICU (94% in <70 years). Fifteen (25%) patients died, 67% in >70 years; 11 (18%) patients died in the first 15 days of admission and 4 (7%) between days 16 to 30. Twenty-three (38%) patients received BARI, 12 (52%) monotherapy (Group 1), during 6 (SD: 2.6) days on average, none required ICU and 2 (17%) died. Thirty-one (52%) patients received TCZ, 20 (33%) as monotherapy (Group 2), 16 (52%) patients required ICU and 4 (20%) died. In the 11 (18%) patients who received BARI (2.8 [SD: 2.5] days average) and TCZ combined (Group 3), 3 (27%) required ICU and died. There were no severe side effects in BARI or TCZ patients. In the 17 (28%) patients who received neither BARI nor TCZ (Group 4), none required ICU and 6 (35%) died. Mean (SD) PaO2/FiO2 at admission between groups was respectively: 167 (82.3), 221 (114.9), 236 (82.3), 276 (83.2). CONCLUSION: Treatment with BARI and TCZ did not cause serious side effects. They could be considered early in patients with NI secondary to COVID19 and impaired PaO2/PaFi.

7.
Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal ; 11(3):220-234, 2020.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-884242

ABSTRACT

This article presents two flexible operational process models (OPM) that could serve as guidelines for a self-access language centre (SALC) in the provision of advising services and workshops not only at difficult times such as the one caused by COVID-19, but also on a regular basis. The aim of the models is to provide a vision to plan, monitor, evaluate and improve the processes involved in the provision of the above mentioned services which have been described by a number of authors as approaches to fostering autonomy in language learners. Tassinari (2010) sees these two approaches at SALCs as a way to offer support and guidance for learners on their path towards autonomy. The OPMs presented in this paper include a reconsideration of the relationships between the implementation of a quality management system (QMS) offered by the International Organization for Standardization (IOS) and the processes involved in the planning, monitoring and eventually evaluating the steps involved in the enhancement of learner autonomy and language learner competence in a SALC. Keeping in mind that if a SALC opts to implement a quality approach in the provision of their services, it will require a fundamental transformation in its managerial strategies, not only to obtain a quality award, but also if they choose to improve their management processes related to the provision of its services as well.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL